Reduction and Net Zero Targets
>Note: intensity targets are not represented in the current version - see Methodology
Gross Absolute Emission Reductions
There is no absolute emission reduction recorded in our database. Email us to report missing information Email
Net Absolute Emission Reductions
There is no absolute emission reduction recorded in our database. Email us to report missing information Email
Net Zero Future Commitments
There is no net zero target recorded in our database. Email us to report missing information Email
Offsets
Last update for Archer Daniels Midland by zerotracker.net: Sept. 4, 2024Planning to use external offset credits | Not Specified |
Separate targets for emission reductions and removals | No |
Conditions on use of offset credits | None |
Plans for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) | Yes (nature-based and CCS-based removals) |
Additional notes: (Pg. 37) "Our carbon capture and sequestration facility in Decatur, Illinois has allowed us to safely and permanently store more than 3.5 million metric tons of CO2 a mile and a half under the surface of the earth. We recently signed a Letter of Intent with Wolf Carbon Solutions US LLC to enable additional decarbonization via the construction of a pipeline – developed, owned and operated by Wolf Carbon Solutions – which, together with a commercial agreement, will allow for the capture, compression and transportation of carbon dioxide produced at our Clinton and Cedar Rapids, Iowa, facilities. Designed as the backbone infrastructure needed to support the region’s lower carbon transition, the 350-mile steel trunk line will be capable of transporting 12 million tons of CO2 per year. The pipeline will offer dedicated capacity to transport CO2 from our facilities in Clinton and Cedar Rapids to be stored permanently underground at our sequestration site in Decatur, Illinois. The pipeline would have significant spare capacity to serve other third-party customers looking to decarbonize across the Midwest and Ohio River Valley."
Score Summary
Ref | Principle |
Score
(points) |
Max
(points) |
Delta
(points) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | At least 2 years of GHG emissions for scope 1 and 2 are publicly-available and externally-verified | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
2 | Scope 3 emissions are fully reported and externally-verified | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
3 | CDP score demonstrates the level of transparent disclosures | 8.0 | 10.0 | - |
Transparency | 8.0 | 30.0 | - | |
4 | Net Zero Commitments by 2050 include an intermediate target and cover all the emissions | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
5 | Net Zero targets demonstrate a high-level of emergency | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
6 | Emission reduction targets on a forward-looking basis are ambitious | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
7 | Targets are science-based as validated by SBTi | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
Commitments | 0.0 | 40.0 | - | |
8 | Results re. operational emissions reduction: on-pace (performance-to-date) and momentum (forward-looking targets) | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
9 | Results re. value chain emissions reduction: on-pace (performance-to-date) and momentum (forward-looking targets) | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
10 | Implied Temperature Rating by MSCi | 0.0 | 10.0 | - |
Results | 0.0 | 30.0 | - | |
Total | 8.0 | 100.0 | - |
Score Details
Criteria | Results | 2023 Score | 2022 Score | Vs. 2022 | 2021 Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criteria 1 : Transparency on operational emissions (Scope 1 + 2) | |||||
Are S1+S2 figures publicly-disclosed for the last reporting year and the preceding period? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Are S1+S2 figures verified by a 3rd-party for the last reporting year? | NC | 0.0/ 5.0 | - | ||
Criteria 2 : Transparency on value chain emissions (Scope 3) | |||||
Are the 15 categories fully or partly disclosed? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Are S3 figures fully or partly verified by a 3rd-party for the last reporting year? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Criteria 3 : Quality and Frequency of reporting | |||||
What is the latest CDP score (no later than the preceding year)? | B | 8.0 / 10.0 | - | ||
How many interim reporting were provided between 2 reporting periods (GHG emissions only)? | |||||
Criteria 4 : Net Zero Commitments | |||||
Does the net 0 target include a statement of a generally-accepted net zero emission target by 2050? | NC | 0.0 / 3.0 | - | ||
Does the net zero target include an intermediate target by 2030? | NC | 0.0 / 3.0 | - | ||
Does the net zero target include all the emissions? | NC | 0.0 / 4.0 | - | ||
Criteria 5 : Target year for Net Zero Commitments | |||||
Target year for achieving net zero emissions for S1+S2? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Target year for achieving net zero emissions for S1+S2+S3 combined? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Criteria 6 : Reduction objectives | |||||
What is the forward-looking GHG% reduction (without compensation) for scope 1+2? | 0.0 / 5.0 | - | |||
What is the forward-looking GHG% reduction (without compensation) for scope 1+2+3? |
No target found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Criteria 7 : Science-Based Targets | |||||
What type of science-based target (as validated by SBTi) did the company commit to? | NC | 0.0 / 10.0 | - | ||
Criteria 8 : Results based on scope 1 - 2 | |||||
Performance to date: cumulative% reduction vs. target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Momentum: last year % reduction vs. forward-looking target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Criteria 9 : Results based on scope 1 - 2 - 3 | |||||
Performance to date: cumulative% reduction vs. target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Momentum: last year % reduction vs. forward-looking target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | - | ||
Criteria 10 : Implied Temperature Rise (ITR) | |||||
Is the company aligned with global climate targets? | ITR: None°C | 0.0 / 10.0 | - | ||
Total | 8.0 / 100.0 | - |
© Vincent Manier - September 2021 About us . Keep in touch . Blog